[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: an update to automake-1.11?



On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 10:45:46AM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> What line number changes? You cut a patch against configure, and you're  
> done. That's it.

And you get a big patch containing line numbers.  Here's a single line
change to configure.ac, and the corresponding patch that generates:

http://annexia.org/tmp/configure.patch

Note: I'm not even changing the version of autoconf, because really
what you mean is I have to track down the exact same version of all
autotools that the upstream author used.  If you don't do that, then
you get a _real_ big patch.

> I fail to see any substantive difference between that, and patching any  
> other file in the source tarball. With a subsequent release, you'll still 
> have to rebase your existing patch, if the new release did not fix the  
> original bug.

No you don't - often patches continue to work over versions.  Not in
the case where you're patching a binary of course ...

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine.  Supports Linux and Windows.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]