[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Feature proposal: Extended Life Cycle Support



On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 05:13:45PM +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>
>On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 22:13:07 +0100, Christopher Brown
><snecklifter gmail com>
>wrote:
>> Honestly, I'm impressed by your persistence but I think simply trying
>> to re-instate Fedora Legacy (which it sounds like this is what you are
>> trying to do) is doomed to permanent failure.
>> 
>
>I love your argumentation behind this statement;
>
>Why do you think it's doomed exactly? Is it reasoning following the past
>Fedora Legacy initiatives (and failure), or is there anything new?

Hyperbole aside, ignoring history doesn't seem prudent.

Fedora Legacy (the original one) failed.

The last time something like this was proposed, it generated a few meetings
and some discussion here and on f-a-b.  I have yet to see anything actually
come of that.

Without a concrete group of people large enough to make this wory saying that
they are signing up to do that work, I don't have high hopes for this
succeeding in the long run.

josh


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]