[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Possible packages...




On Jul 10, 2009, at 7:41 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:

On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:22:20 Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:15:47 Jarod Wilson wrote:
Stuff in Fedora, but simply not used for whatever reason:
-vobject (we have python-vobject)
-pyflakes

I thought they were used if found... I'd have to look at the run file to
see if they ignore the system versions..

They weren't here. Had 'em already installed, and the run script still
insisted on downloading private copies.

There are two patches they have for vobject, so that might explain why
a local copy of that is still being used. No clue on pyflakes though.

Neither pyflakes or vobject are wrapped with a "only checkout local
copies if it doesn't already exist on the system" check. After adding
checks, I've got it running using the system versions of these now
too. There may be $something that doesn't work right w/o the patches
to vobject though, dunno.


Yeah, I was planning on using their caldavtester to test. Find any regressions...

I can't remember what package when not quite new enough caused some odd responses in the test suite, but most looked harmless (data came back correctly, but sometimes key/value pairs were in a different order from what the test was expecting, otherwise it was identical).

I just got a bit busy so hadn't continued to investigate, however I figured this package would necessitate including updating some fedora packages, as well as seeing how if their local patches could be pushed upstream somehow.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]