[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Champlain



On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 18:25 +0530, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> 
> So no one is affected by this change. On the other hand, 0.2.x is old
> and 0.3.x is where the fun is. So atleast some developers would
> benefit from it and libchamplain-0.3 would also get some testing
> leading to a better 0.4.x.

Since the are some consumers that could make use of it that I wasn't
aware of, it's probably worth it (assuming we also update Rawhide, so we
don't have NVR issues).

Later,
/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple fedoraproject org>

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]