[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: epel-release in Fedora repos?



On Tue July 14 2009, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "JK" == Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com> writes:
>
> JK> At 7000+ srpms there is no way I could evaluate each and every one
> JK> for validity before submitting it for a rebuild.
>
> I think the point is that the package owner should have deleted it
> from devel so that there would be nothing for rel-eng to rebuild.

Imho if the devel branch is a problem, then it should not be created when the 
package is imported to CVS, if it is a epel-only package. Requesting such 
strange actions from package maintainers who may not know all the magic behind 
the build system will only lead to errors like this one.

Regards
Till

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]