[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:

>> Ingvar Hagelund wrote:
>>> If anyone are interested in the packages, they are available 
from
>>> http://ingvar.blog.linpro.no/2009/06/11/amarok-14-for-
fedora-11/
> 
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Greg Trounsonwrote:
>> Thank you Ingvar.  After using Amarok 2 for a couple of 
months I'm convinced
>> it has a long way to go before it comes near Amarok 1.4 in 
terms of
>> features, usability and robustness.
> 
> Thanks,
> Actually, I also feel amarok 2.0 has a long way to go. I feel 
that
> Amarok is another good opensource product turning into a 
crappy one.
> 
> Amarok 1.4's features : ipod support and cuesheet support are 
missing
> in the 2.0 version since a long time and upstream is not 
giving enough
> love to them. cuesheet is broken release after release while 
upstream
> is claiming better cuesheet support in their release notes. 
Sadly.
> 
> Chitlesh
> 

Someone stated that 2.2 got the look-and-feel of 1.4 as an 
option. Maybe you'd like to try that? Currently would need 
build-from-source.

- --Ben
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkpkld4ACgkQiPi+MRHG3qSXOgCfV4G4ZhDG4hHtIPK3NrcZpi/B
y6QAoIfBbPOhDSO6xTkzwIkpHK+7Qdvq
=2fYL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]