[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [pkgdb] libatomic_ops: sharkcz has requested approveacls



2009/7/24 Dan Horák <dan danny cz>:
> Nicolas Chauvet píše v Pá 24. 07. 2009 v 10:06 +0200:
>> This package was orphaned because libatomic_ops is going to be merged with gc.
>> Do we have a particular rationale about why to continue to maintain it
>> over splitting libatomic_ops-static from the current gc 7.1 where
>> libatomic_ops snapshot is newer ?
>> (despite versioned as 1.2)
>
> But do you know about any status update or confirmation of the plan from
> upstream besides the 1 year old notice on thier web page? I couldn't
> find anything on their mailing list.
Because you didn't ask, did you ?
http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/gc/2009-July/subject.html

At least, doing a diff between libatomic_ops-1.2 and
gc-7.1/libatomic_ops-1.2 shows that the gc 7.1 version much more
newer.

Nicolas (kwizart)

But As you seems to have it in doubt


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]