[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [pkgdb] libatomic_ops: sharkcz has requested approveacls



Nicolas Chauvet wrote:

> 2009/7/24 Dan Horák <dan danny cz>:
>> Nicolas Chauvet píše v Pá 24. 07. 2009 v 10:06 +0200:
>>> This package was orphaned because libatomic_ops is going to be merged
>>> with gc. Do we have a particular rationale about why to continue to
>>> maintain it over splitting libatomic_ops-static from the current gc 7.1
>>> where libatomic_ops snapshot is newer ?
>>> (despite versioned as 1.2)
>>
>> But do you know about any status update or confirmation of the plan from
>> upstream besides the 1 year old notice on thier web page? I couldn't
>> find anything on their mailing list.
> Because you didn't ask, did you ?
> http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/gc/2009-July/subject.html
> 
> At least, doing a diff between libatomic_ops-1.2 and
> gc-7.1/libatomic_ops-1.2 shows that the gc 7.1 version much more
> newer.

I'll get to work on it (preferably keeping it in the separate libatomic_ops
cvs module for now).

-- Rex



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]