[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release



On 07/26/2009 08:12 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 21:42 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 07/25/2009 08:56 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
Fortunately I had read in this list that upgrading breaks Yum so I did a fresh
install instead, and only had to spend a few days getting all the configuration
back into shape. Sound started working after I deleted ~/.pulse.

and if you is broken then the whole system is broken! so everybody have
to spenda few days to get back their config. so we only have to spend a
few days every half year. it's even worse then if i install windows.
it's a really nice release.
why is it so difficult to upgrade packages?

I upgraded my laptop from F10 to F11, with X running, via yum. It worked
flawlessly and rebooted clean.
When I tried, FC-10's yum had been unable to process "metalinks".

May-be FC-10's yum has been updated since then ;)

Anecdotal evidence means very little.
It may be news to you, but a single negative result invalidates a whole series of "positive tests" ;)

My personal list of "upgrade FC-10->FC-11 failures" is rather lengthyg, however most of the issues I encountered were related to preupdate, anaconda and rel-eng mistakes.

Ralf



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]