[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release



On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 08:34 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 07/26/2009 08:12 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 21:42 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> >> On 07/25/2009 08:56 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> >>> Fortunately I had read in this list that upgrading breaks Yum so I did a fresh
> >>> install instead, and only had to spend a few days getting all the configuration
> >>> back into shape. Sound started working after I deleted ~/.pulse.
> >>
> >> and if you is broken then the whole system is broken! so everybody have
> >> to spenda few days to get back their config. so we only have to spend a
> >> few days every half year. it's even worse then if i install windows.
> >> it's a really nice release.
> >> why is it so difficult to upgrade packages?
> >
> > I upgraded my laptop from F10 to F11, with X running, via yum. It worked
> > flawlessly and rebooted clean.
> When I tried, FC-10's yum had been unable to process "metalinks".
> 
> May-be FC-10's yum has been updated since then ;)

Oh, I forgot about that. There was a simple change you could do to the
yum configuration files. I found it in the documentation for upgrading
via yum on the Wiki. Good thing I read documentation, really, isn't
it...

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]