[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora Bugzilla Statistics 2009-05-26 - 2009-06-01

On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 09:08 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam redhat com> wrote:
> > It could do, but on the other hand, we're mostly getting to the point
> > where the components that lack coverage are ones which need a triager
> > who's already knowledgeable about that component: we can't just
> > parachute someone in. (see e.g. anaconda and kernel).
> How short is that list of components? Can you visualize that?  Just
> identifying that finite list could help motivate exactly that sort of
> recruitment effort needed to fill the need.  If we identify the short
> list accurately, can we then advertise the short list as a rewarding
> challenge to undertake?  Our very own elite highly trained
> specialists..our 00's..our A-team.  So highly prized they even get
> codenames and catch phrases.

Anything on the Components and Triagers page where there's no-one under
"Active Triagers". :) (oh, and "Need help?" is not set to No).

Currently that list is:


as I said, these are bits that you kinda need decent expertise on to be
able to triage properly. PackageKit might be the lowest-hanging fruit on
that list.

you can add:


each of these currently isn't really being triaged by any triagers.
Lennart is happy to have triage for PA, but only from someone who
already knows what they're talking about when it comes to PA in quite
some detail (which is quite a small pool). I'm currently working with
the anaconda / kernel folks to see what we can do about setting down the
requirements for triage for those components.
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]