[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Maintainer Responsibilities

On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 09:01 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 23:19 +0200, Edwin ten Brink wrote:
> > Aside from all discussions in this thread, the current Bugzilla 
> > documentation seems quite clear on this topic. Whatever the outcome of 
> > the discussion is, I think the documentation which is visible to the 
> > end-user (customer), should at least match the common practice/procedure.
> > 
> > Note also that the discussion is primarily focussed on the Resolution of 
> > the bug report, while there are also two Keywords available with respect 
> > to upstream. I've quoted the full texts below for reference.
> >  From https://bugzilla.redhat.com/describekeywords.cgi
> This page doesn't really cover Fedora policy or practice, it covers RHEL
> policy and practice, which is not the same thing.

Sorry, I mistook this: the page that's not strictly entirely applicable
to Fedora is the one you link to lower down:


not the keyword description page. We don't presently have a separate
keyword description page for Fedora. I haven't looked yet at whether any
of the keywords or descriptions are inapplicable to Fedora, if they are,
we should probably 'branch' that page too.
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]