More mock problems

[Rich Megginson]

Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On 06/08/2009 03:15 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
>
>   
>> Ah, so it is.  Thanks!  So now my only hurdle is the missing popt-devel
>> - any ideas?
>>
>>     
> That one looks like a genuine packaging bug.  We don't use rpm-devel on
> the builders so no one saw it.
>
> The header files for popt are in the main popt package in RHEL5/CentOS5
> so that's what actually needs to be required in this instance, not
> popt-devel.
>   
Can I just do rpm --nodeps -Uvh rpm*.rpm?
> -Toshio
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3258 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090609/e26f4a78/attachment.bin>