[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: GRUB 2 in Ubuntu 9.10



2009/6/10 Matthias Clasen <mclasen redhat com>:
> On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 18:41 +0200, Dennis J. wrote:
>
>> If that's the case then it obviously makes sense to stick with grub
>> "legacy" but given it's status who is going to be upstream for this? What I
>> fear is a similar situation like we had with rpm where nobody really took
>> ownership and vendors carried their own individual patches wich doesn't
>> really work well with fedoras "stay close to upstream" mantra.
>
> For better or worse, we are effectively running a grub fork, and I see
> very little desire to change that...

Is extlinux worth considering as a replacement? I know Foresight has
gone that road.

Jonathan (who knows nothing about bootloaders).


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]