[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora LaTeX SIG?



Le jeudi 11 juin 2009 à 12:17 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit :
> >>>>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas mailhot laposte net> writes:
> 
> NM> I didn't see this before but I can only agree with the replies:
> NM> this is an insane plan. Nobody is ever going to review properly a
> NM> 2.7 MiB spec file, updating will be hell, etc.
> 
> Isn't it nice, then that the final plan is different from the
> initially proposed one?  I see that you read the thread, so why bother
> commenting on something that's not currently being proposed?

I didn't notice at first that archive threading was broken and that you
had bits of the thread right and left. Also, I didn't see any clear
final plan in the list archives

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]