Split Media - A use case
Avery, David [DENTK]
David.Avery at united.com
Mon Jun 15 16:36:13 UTC 2009
Use case :
PIII 950Mhz system CDROM installed , no DVD, NO USB boot option , no PXE
boot option, local network does not allow DHCP server ( corp rules)
, local net is firewalled from internet via (http | ftp) proxy
Yes it's old
It was running F10
It _Needs_ split CD to install
Anaconda takes forever because it won't accept proxy info and has to
mutiply time out trying to access unreachable network mirrors
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-devel-list-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-devel-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Cronenworth
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 10:25 AM
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re: Split Media - A use case
G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:
> That's what they wanted to use :-) besides it was quicker to gen
> them than to download the live CDs or DVDs.
>
CDs will be much slower than a DVD in terms of read speed. You'll also
have to swap disks out during install (hello 1998). Why do they "want"
to use CDs?
In fact, why are you wasting a DVD or CDs? That's not very green of you.
Give them a USB stick with the DVD install ISO loaded on it so it can be
reused for more useful things.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list