[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Why do we need FC version attached to the package name?



On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 06:20:07PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>On 06/22/2009 05:35 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>>> Isn't the scripts Michael Schwendt refers to, not useful anymore? Even
>> 
>> It's useful.  It's generally after the fact though, and in the long run I think
>> we want to be proactive, not reactive.
>
>I agree but we aren't even reacting much now. If the scripts run from
>infrastructure systems automatically as opposed to having someone run it
>manually, I suspect it would help fix most of the issues we are
>currently having.

True.  Care to file a rel-eng ticket suggesting we setup a cronjob to do so?
The script will likely need some rework and it may take some time, but the
ticket is a good starting point.

josh


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]