[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: yum 3.2.23 more than 10x slower than 3.2.21?!



Seth Vidal wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> 
>> Seth Vidal wrote:
>>>
>>> and if you can make this happen every time with 3.2.23 if you could
>>> please run:
>>>
>>> time yum -d 3 list updates | grep 'time:'
>>
>> You were not talking to me, but I tried and
>> look at this: (added -C to avoid net access)
>>
>> # time yum -C -d 3 list updates --disablerepo=atrpms\* | grep 'time:'
>> Config time: 0.271
>> repo time: 0.001
>> pkgsack time: 86.684
> 
> and you're POSITIVE nothing is being downloaded here? Nothing at all?
> 
> Run it again, please and capture all the output and post it to a pastebin.
> 

I have a hint and it points to the "same rpms in more than one repo"
hypothesis.

yum -d 5 lists a lot of

excluding for cost: firefox-3.0.11-1.fc10.i386 from updates
excluding for cost: gnome-session-2.24.3-1.fc10.i386 from updates
[...]

I see something related to cost handling fixes in the yum Changelog.

My guess is that elements are removed from an array one at a time
and everything after that is moved back one position.
Or some inefficiency of that kind.

You may be able to reproduce it by configuring two updates repos.

-- 
   Roberto Ragusa    mail at robertoragusa.it


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]