FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

Matthew Garrett mjg at redhat.com
Sat Jun 27 00:28:47 UTC 2009


On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 07:17:12PM -0500, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Gnome in Fedora simply gets more development effort, has more  
>> documentation based around it and therefore deserves to be the default. 
>> Pretending that KDE has the same level of support does nothing to  
>> benefit KDE.
>
> There is a self-fulfilling prophecy in there.

It's not the project's role to lift non-default software to the same 
level of involvement as the default software. Why /should/ KDE be 
treated equally?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list