FESCo Meeting Summary - 2009-03-06

David Nielsen gnomeuser at gmail.com
Sat Mar 7 00:00:58 UTC 2009


2009/3/7 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com>

> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 02:59:33PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > David Nielsen (gnomeuser at gmail.com) said:
> > > I did not see this one the action list for this meeting, nor was I even
> > > invited to argue the case for this.
> >
> > The feature wrangler requested that FESCo issue a decision on it.
>
> It's not the first time it has happened that some feature has been
> dropped without the owner being told that a decision was going to be
> made.  I think this should, as common courtesy, go back before FESCo
> next week.
>
> Most packagers are volunteers (even the ones who work at Red Hat).
>

I believe that would be the right approach, however it would not make a
difference in this case and would only serve to waste precious time. I have
retracted my proprosal from consideration, I think I will do what Jesse
proposed and draw my own conclusions. FESco made a decision, I will abide
it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090307/59cdef06/attachment.htm>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list