Explicit rpm requires

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 18:02 -0400, Matthew D Truch wrote:
> Without that,
> rpm would have just done the libcfitsio.so.0 dependancy (but cfitsio
> people don't bump the soname every time).  

They don't want to soname bump, but they want to forcefully require the
exact same version compiled against is used?  Have you hit them with
something heavy lately?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090310/eebbc00c/attachment.sig>