Please fix your bugs in release instead of rawhide! (Part 2)

[Matthew Woehlke]

Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> I'm sure there are other examples one can find, but I do not
> understand why the bugs should be fixed in release instead of rawhide.
> It would be certainly good to fix bugs in stable releases but why
> shouldn't they be fixed in rawhide at the same time?

I don't think anyone is saying stuff shouldn't be fixed in rawhide when 
it makes sense to do so*, just that some stuff should be fixed in 
release /also/.

(* e.g. rawhide isn't a totally different code base, which can happen 
some times.)

-- 
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
-- 
Microsoft has become the next IBM; a dinosaur struggling to survive in 
the age of more able-to-adapt mammals (FLOSS). It remains to be seen if 
they'll be able to adapt before they go extinct.