"Please split doc into foo-doc subpackage" -> why?

[Callum Lerwick]

On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 22:34 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:24:21 -0400, Orcan wrote:
> 
> > There is another inconsistency. Some -doc subpackages in Fedora
> > require the main package and some don't. I don't know what someone can
> > do with, for instance, API docs of a library without having the
> > library itself.
> 
> You can browse the API documentation and evaluate it, then decide whether
> you want to develop with the library.

Or read the documentation to some piece of software on a
faster/better/more local machine, that's in use on a headless server 
somewhere on the other side of an overburdened internet link.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090326/7bcc9c3b/attachment.sig>