FESCo Meeting Summary for 20090424
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Sat May 2 13:57:34 UTC 2009
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 01:25:29AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 07:13:20PM -0500, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> > Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >> How many volume control applications do you want us to ship with? The
> >> fact that mistakes have been made in the past is not an argument for
> >> further mistakes being made in the future.
> >
> > To ask the dumb question... right now pavucontrol is the only way
> > (AFAIK) right now to change relative volume of individual apps, or
> > choose output device per-app. Without pavucontrol, how is this supposed
> > to be accomplished?
>
> Per-stream volume control seems to be present in g-v-c. I'm afraid I've
> got no idea about per-stream output control - I only have one output
> device available here.
>
> > (Or are both of these being labeled "exotic" use cases that shan't be
> > supported OOTB?)
>
> I don't know. I'd imagine that the first certainly isn't (given that it
> seems to be supported), but you'd need to ask someone else about the
> second.
It would be a shame if the second was considered exotic, since it's
supposed to be a feature of PulseAudio. I used it to create this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_make_a_podcast
Of course, if I understand correctly, you're not saying pavucontrol
would disappear, just that the design considerations under discussion
might call for it to not be installed by default. Right?
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list