FESCo Meeting Summary for 20090424
Callum Lerwick
seg at haxxed.com
Sun May 3 20:00:44 UTC 2009
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 19:34 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 12:07:43PM -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 00:48 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > The problem with the desktop is that it's obvious, looks simple and
> > > everyone has an opinion on it. But not all of these opinions are equally
> > > valid. This kind of situation is much easier to deal with in, say, the
> > > kernel VM system - in that case it would be perfectly acceptable for
> > > people who spend their entire working lives concentrating on a specific
> > > topic to say that they know better than people who occasionally touch
> > > upon it.
> >
> > ... And the kernel VM people tend to be able to back up their expertise
> > with hard data. If a patch isn't an improvement in some provable manner,
> > it doesn't get in to the kernel.
>
> Like everything else, kernel VM performance is a tradeoff. Improvements
> may benefit certain workloads while impairing others. It's rare for
> changes to improve things for everybody - so the end result is a
> judgement call, generally by the people who are assumed to know what
> they're doing.
No, it is not a judgement call. Hard performance measurements are not
subjective.
We developers are not sheep, and this is not a closed proprietary
project. We expect our experts to show their work.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090503/8a1febae/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list