[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: 182 pending F11 stable updates. WTF?



On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 16:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com> writes:
> > I don't see anything wrong with this, as you're getting somebody to test
> > it before you move it.  The thing that bothered me was how many packages
> > were going straight into updates without passing -testing.
> 
> Well, as you just pointed out yourself, F11 testing is nonfunctional as
> yet.  But the bigger problem is that putting stuff into -testing seldom

Actually I don't see any important reason why not make F11 testing
functional as soon as F11 is frozen in rawhide.
-- 
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
                                              Turkish proverb


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]