[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: 182 pending F11 stable updates. WTF?



On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 10:38:14PM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 16:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com> writes:
> > > I don't see anything wrong with this, as you're getting somebody to test
> > > it before you move it.  The thing that bothered me was how many packages
> > > were going straight into updates without passing -testing.
> > 
> > Well, as you just pointed out yourself, F11 testing is nonfunctional as
> > yet.  But the bigger problem is that putting stuff into -testing seldom
> 
> Actually I don't see any important reason why not make F11 testing
> functional as soon as F11 is frozen in rawhide.

That would have been the least confusing thing to do (assuming it was a
feasible option to begin with).  I *tried* to use -testing, but nothing
happened so I went ahead and pushed to stable because I knew my package
was fine and it'd been a couple weeks.

Ray


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]