182 pending F11 stable updates. WTF?
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Fri May 8 15:17:58 UTC 2009
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 10:59 +0200, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
>
> I really agree with this. I think we need F11/updates and F11/updates-testing
> soon after devel freeze. You get bugs reported for snapshots, previews,... but
> fixing these bugs and especially delivering them to users is too much difficult
> imho.
Erm, it's too hard to do the build, then propose a freeze break to fix
the bug? If the bug is important enough that you're getting reports on
it, why not propose that the final release has the bug fixed?
>
> In my dreamworld we have rawhide -> F11, F11/updates, F11/updates-testing in a
> few days after devel freeze. I think at least F11/updates-testing (without
> F11/updates available before day or two ago F11 GA) would be really
> appreciated by developers.
I'm not sure what you mean by rawhide -> F11, however you do bring up an
interesting idea. Shortly after the freeze, if we did start releasing
updates-testing, then the things that pass -testing could indeed go to
the release rather than updates. That's not a terrible idea, I'll have
to think some on it and talk with the bodhi developer.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090508/084c83d0/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list