[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: 182 pending F11 stable updates. WTF?



Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 08:31 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Many bugs are not worth breaking the freeze for, but nor should the
freeze bring development to a standstill.  If upstream releases a new
package, adds features or what-not (not necessarily fixing some
critical bug) should I delay releasing an update for F10 because I
don't want to conflict with the EVR of the package that was frozen for
F11?

There is no reason to delay the F10 update.  Trying to avoid NVR
breakage is a lost cause, it'll be broken between F10 updates and F11 GA
almost immediately.
They are only broken, because your practices force them to be broken.

This is a defect of your approach to preparing Fedora releases.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]