[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: glibc fork ?



On 05/09/2009 05:37 PM, Denis Leroy wrote:

> But if the eglibc fork stands (unlikely IMO) and Canonical switches as
> well, I'd like to see RH fire Drepper.

If eglibc has to continously rebase from glibc, glibc has to continue
it's development. Considering that Ubuntu is heavily based on Debian, it
is rather odd to connect Canonical's dependencies to your desire for
someone to lose their job. At this point, this doesn't appear to much of
a community discussion.

Rahul


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]