OpenOffice 3.1
Christian Rose
menthos at menthos.com
Sat May 9 15:58:50 UTC 2009
On 5/9/09, Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 12:51 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > Well, in this case updating F-10 3.1 properly would require updating a
> > load of other stuff as well with all the risks and work that entails.
> > But even if that wasn't the case I generally don't bump major versions
> > of OOo in a released product. I see our fedora release cycle as ones of
> > iterative stable complete releases, rather than one which has an
> > always-open pool of stable packages which always contains the latest
> > stable version of a package. i.e. F-10 was history as soon as it was
> > released, and F-11 is likewise almost dead to me already :-) Not that I
> > won't fix bugs in them, just that I don't see them as live development
> > releases.
>
> I thank you for this!
+1
IMHO, Fedora needs more maintainers who think of whole releases as
stable release sets.
Christian
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list