182 pending F11 stable updates. WTF?
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Mon May 11 18:57:34 UTC 2009
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 14:35 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> Why do we not force updates to Fedora X to always be N-V-R older than
> Fedora X+1? We can use the Release tag to enforce this within a
> Version, and newer Versions shouldn't appear in older Fedora's until
> they've been in the newer Fedora first.
"until they've been in the newer Fedora first" doesn't work with the
newer fedora release media is a static pile of packages.
Your suggest would lead to not allowing F10's package versions to /ever/
be newer than what Fedora 11 ships with at GA.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090511/a898b5a1/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list