[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Bug lifecycle page revised / expanded



On Tue, 12 May 2009 13:30:59 -0600
Jerry James <loganjerry gmail com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Adam Williamson
> <awilliam redhat com> wrote:
> > Hi, everyone - just a quick note that, last week, I revised /
> > expanded the bug lifecycle page:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow
> 
> I have two questions about situations outside the realm of bug triage.
>  Both involve package reviews.
> 
> 1. Suppose I submit a package for review, and then later decide that I
> want to withdraw the submission for some reason.  (I had this happen
> recently when legal problems with the package came to light.)  The
> review bug should go to state CLOSED, but with what reason?  WONTFIX?

Yes. See: 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process

> 2. Suppose I decide to review a package submission.  I assign the
> review bug to myself.  The review turns up some problems that need to
> be fixed.  The person submitting the package doesn't respond for a
> long time.  Now what?  Do I mark the bug NEEDINFO?  What if the
> submitter still doesn't respond?  (I've got several bugs assigned to
> me that are currently in this state.)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews

kevin

> Thanks,

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]