Bug lifecycle page revised / expanded
Kevin Fenzi
kevin at scrye.com
Wed May 13 16:24:08 UTC 2009
On Tue, 12 May 2009 13:30:59 -0600
Jerry James <loganjerry at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Adam Williamson
> <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hi, everyone - just a quick note that, last week, I revised /
> > expanded the bug lifecycle page:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow
>
> I have two questions about situations outside the realm of bug triage.
> Both involve package reviews.
>
> 1. Suppose I submit a package for review, and then later decide that I
> want to withdraw the submission for some reason. (I had this happen
> recently when legal problems with the package came to light.) The
> review bug should go to state CLOSED, but with what reason? WONTFIX?
Yes. See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
> 2. Suppose I decide to review a package submission. I assign the
> review bug to myself. The review turns up some problems that need to
> be fixed. The person submitting the package doesn't respond for a
> long time. Now what? Do I mark the bug NEEDINFO? What if the
> submitter still doesn't respond? (I've got several bugs assigned to
> me that are currently in this state.)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
kevin
> Thanks,
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090513/52cc1567/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list