[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: gnaughty is a hot babe



On Thu, 28 May 2009 15:13:32 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <sundaram fedoraproject org> wrote:

> 
> Hi
> 
> My packaging survey turned up a interesting suggestion
> 
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-May/msg01809.html
> 
> We don't currently have any guidelines covering this but considering
> the Debian action to hot babe
> 
> http://lwn.net/Articles/113644/
> 
> I wanted to asked first,  is this allowed in Fedora?
> 

Hm. interesting case.

I've got no problem with it. Unlike hot-babe there's nothing even
remotely resembling depiction here.

It's essentially a download tool a la aria2/d4x/gwget with a particular
focus/niche and in my opinion fairly innocuous. The author is pretty
up-front about what it is and what it's for - if that's reflected in
the %description then the odds on it being installed "accidentally"
would be fairly low.

> Rahul
> 

Michael "It's only kinky the first time you rpm -i it" Fleming


-- 
Michael Fleming <mfleming thatfleminggent com> - (EMail/XMPP/Jabber)
WWW: http://www.thatfleminggent.com
Fedora / Red Hat Packages: http://www.thatfleminggent.com/rpm-packages
Twitter: http://twitter.com/thatfleminggent 


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]