[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: gnaughty is a hot babe



On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:30:45PM +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> > IMHO it is not Fedora's job to  define family values & moralities. Such morals/values will vary all around the world
> I don't want fedora to define such things, we have our own values predefined.
> 
> it should not make my job finding suck packages difficult
> we have more than 10,000 packages in the repos so don't expect me to
> test them all

Surely that is the very reason for existance of your derived distro
project. If a derived distro wants todo a spin of Fedora with a 
package set that meets some particular criteria, it is the job of
that derived distro to analyse the packages.  If we have to maintain a
list of packages for you, then what is to stop every other derived 
distro asking us to maintain lists of packages for their criteria
too. It is your choice to build a distro with certain restrictions,
ergo, it is your job to analyse the packages to comply with your
restrictions.  If you don't want to analyse all 10,000, then take
a whitelist  approach, instead of a blacklist, and build up your
package set from a small trusted base.

Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]