gnaughty is a hot babe

inode0 inode0 at gmail.com
Fri May 29 14:26:47 UTC 2009


On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Florian Festi <ffesti at redhat.com> wrote:
> inode0 wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Kushal Das <kushaldas at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:16 PM, inode0 <inode0 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> True. Someone should ask the question: does it make sense to have
>>>> different rules if they prevent the inclusion of useful content and
>>>> allow the inclusion of useless code?
>>>
>>> Which is useless to me can be very useful to someone else.
>>
>> That doesn't explain why there is a different standard for content.
>
> It is ok if you know and obey the rules. There is no need for you to
> understand why they are in place. Anyway, Fedora is a Linux distribution
> (for those who did not yet realize) an though (free) Linux software (that
> can be run on Fedora) is what it is all about and content is not (with very
> few exceptions). Software yes - content no. I really see no way or reason
> why there should be a common standard for both.

"To lead the advancement of free and open source software and content
as a collaborative community."

That is the mission statement of what project?

John




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list