[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: gnaughty is a hot babe



On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:02:23AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, 29 May 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> 
> >On 05/29/2009 02:10 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> >>>The problem with a comps group is that it will lead to having a group
> >>>in graphical installers
> >>
> >>although in ojuba we use ourown comps files, but this is a catastrophe
> >>because they are merged!
> >>I guess there is an option for hidden groups
> >>
> >
> >Have these packages:
> >
> >Provides: policy(adult content)
> >
> >And have a package that's mandatory in your respin that has:
> >
> >Conflicts: policy(adult content)
> >
> >/me taking one of the good ideas from the flag debate.
> 
> Except it is obvious that something contains a flag or not.
> 
> Labeling certain content 'questionable' is going to end up being all over 
> the distro and diluting the value of the tag.
> 
> Let me put it this way - if we start randomly rating things in a provides 
> tag and gnaughty or hot-babe or pr0n-comfort get labeled this way then 
> I'll make sure I personally add the same tag to:
> 
> - firefox
> - yum
> - sword
> - gnome-sword

And every email client, because I'm spammed by countless messages
offering adult content every day :-(

Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]