gnaughty is a hot babe
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Fri May 29 15:06:57 UTC 2009
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:02:23AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 29 May 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> >On 05/29/2009 02:10 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> >>>The problem with a comps group is that it will lead to having a group
> >>>in graphical installers
> >>
> >>although in ojuba we use ourown comps files, but this is a catastrophe
> >>because they are merged!
> >>I guess there is an option for hidden groups
> >>
> >
> >Have these packages:
> >
> >Provides: policy(adult content)
> >
> >And have a package that's mandatory in your respin that has:
> >
> >Conflicts: policy(adult content)
> >
> >/me taking one of the good ideas from the flag debate.
>
> Except it is obvious that something contains a flag or not.
>
> Labeling certain content 'questionable' is going to end up being all over
> the distro and diluting the value of the tag.
>
> Let me put it this way - if we start randomly rating things in a provides
> tag and gnaughty or hot-babe or pr0n-comfort get labeled this way then
> I'll make sure I personally add the same tag to:
>
> - firefox
> - yum
> - sword
> - gnome-sword
And every email client, because I'm spammed by countless messages
offering adult content every day :-(
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list