[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: gnaughty is a hot babe



On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 11:02 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 29 May 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> 
> > On 05/29/2009 02:10 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> >>> The problem with a comps group is that it will lead to having a group
> >>> in graphical installers
> >>
> >> although in ojuba we use ourown comps files, but this is a catastrophe
> >> because they are merged!
> >> I guess there is an option for hidden groups
> >>
> >
> > Have these packages:
> >
> > Provides: policy(adult content)
> >
> > And have a package that's mandatory in your respin that has:
> >
> > Conflicts: policy(adult content)
> >
> > /me taking one of the good ideas from the flag debate.
> 
> Except it is obvious that something contains a flag or not.
> 
> Labeling certain content 'questionable' is going to end up being all over 
> the distro and diluting the value of the tag.
> 
> Let me put it this way - if we start randomly rating things in a provides 
> tag and gnaughty or hot-babe or pr0n-comfort get labeled this way then 
> I'll make sure I personally add the same tag to:
> 
> - firefox
> - yum
> - sword
> - gnome-sword

yum ?

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]