[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: gnaughty is a hot babe



On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Simo Sorce <ssorce redhat com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 11:02 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 29 May 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>>
>> > On 05/29/2009 02:10 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
>> >>> The problem with a comps group is that it will lead to having a group
>> >>> in graphical installers
>> >>
>> >> although in ojuba we use ourown comps files, but this is a catastrophe
>> >> because they are merged!
>> >> I guess there is an option for hidden groups
>> >>
>> >
>> > Have these packages:
>> >
>> > Provides: policy(adult content)
>> >
>> > And have a package that's mandatory in your respin that has:
>> >
>> > Conflicts: policy(adult content)
>> >
>> > /me taking one of the good ideas from the flag debate.
>>
>> Except it is obvious that something contains a flag or not.
>>
>> Labeling certain content 'questionable' is going to end up being all over
>> the distro and diluting the value of the tag.
>>
>> Let me put it this way - if we start randomly rating things in a provides
>> tag and gnaughty or hot-babe or pr0n-comfort get labeled this way then
>> I'll make sure I personally add the same tag to:
>>
>> - firefox
>> - yum
>> - sword
>> - gnome-sword
>
> yum ?

it can be used to download/install packages with such content.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]