[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: gnaughty is a hot babe



On 05/29/2009 08:02 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, 29 May 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> 
>> On 05/29/2009 02:10 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
>>>> The problem with a comps group is that it will lead to having a group
>>>> in graphical installers
>>>
>>> although in ojuba we use ourown comps files, but this is a catastrophe
>>> because they are merged!
>>> I guess there is an option for hidden groups
>>>
>>
>> Have these packages:
>>
>> Provides: policy(adult content)
>>
>> And have a package that's mandatory in your respin that has:
>>
>> Conflicts: policy(adult content)
>>
>> /me taking one of the good ideas from the flag debate.
> 
> Except it is obvious that something contains a flag or not.
> 
> Labeling certain content 'questionable' is going to end up being all
> over the distro and diluting the value of the tag.
> 
What about
policy(shows skin) ?

> Let me put it this way - if we start randomly rating things in a
> provides tag and gnaughty or hot-babe or pr0n-comfort get labeled this
> way then I'll make sure I personally add the same tag to:
> 
> - firefox
> - yum
> - sword
> - gnome-sword
> 
sword and gnome-sword could certainly get policy(religious)

firefox could have: policy(the internet is for p0rn)
and yum: policy(ad absurdium)

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]