gnaughty is a hot babe
Toshio Kuratomi
a.badger at gmail.com
Fri May 29 15:11:18 UTC 2009
On 05/29/2009 08:02 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 29 May 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
>> On 05/29/2009 02:10 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
>>>> The problem with a comps group is that it will lead to having a group
>>>> in graphical installers
>>>
>>> although in ojuba we use ourown comps files, but this is a catastrophe
>>> because they are merged!
>>> I guess there is an option for hidden groups
>>>
>>
>> Have these packages:
>>
>> Provides: policy(adult content)
>>
>> And have a package that's mandatory in your respin that has:
>>
>> Conflicts: policy(adult content)
>>
>> /me taking one of the good ideas from the flag debate.
>
> Except it is obvious that something contains a flag or not.
>
> Labeling certain content 'questionable' is going to end up being all
> over the distro and diluting the value of the tag.
>
What about
policy(shows skin) ?
> Let me put it this way - if we start randomly rating things in a
> provides tag and gnaughty or hot-babe or pr0n-comfort get labeled this
> way then I'll make sure I personally add the same tag to:
>
> - firefox
> - yum
> - sword
> - gnome-sword
>
sword and gnome-sword could certainly get policy(religious)
firefox could have: policy(the internet is for p0rn)
and yum: policy(ad absurdium)
-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090529/2662f941/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list