[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: conflict between seedit <-> selinux-policy and qstat <-> torque-client



On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs math uh edu> wrote:
>>>>>> "RK" == Rudolf Kastl <che666 gmail com> writes:
>
> RK> 2. qstat and torque-client both provide a qstat binary... is there
> RK> anything done to get that resolved upstream? or is it a "conflicts
> RK> and forget" scenario?
>
> This one, I think, should be easily resolvable with alternatives.
>
Would be happy for an alternatives solution. I have yet another
/usr/bin/qstat for a POSIX interface to batch on the way at some point.

> Actually I think all but a small number of the currently conflicting
> packages could be fixed up pretty easily.  Currently it doesn't seem
> that there's any sort of enforcement outside of the original package
> review.
>
> The way around this is, of course, for someone to spend some time
> generating the current list of conflicting packages, proposing
> solutions, and working with FESCo in the case that those solutions are
> not applied.
>
>  - J<
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>



-- 
Steve Traylen


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]