[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: qstat conflicts



2009/11/5 Andy Shevchenko <andy shevchenko gmail com>:
> Hello.
>
> I have got few bugs [1] about conflicts between qstat (package) and
> torque-client where qstat is a POSIX registered name for some special
> service.
> Upstream as far as I know is like dead than alive. Thus, better
> solution to rename binary is not so simple.
> Nowadays the Conflicts: field is filled in the qstat.spec but
> torque-client doesn't have such field (and I understand the point).
>
> So, my idea is to ask upstream to change binary name and
> simultaneously raise discussion at distributions-list fdo to do the
> same if upstream doesn't appear.
>
> Any comments, suggestions?
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472750
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
There have been various comments in a former thread raised about the
conflict a few days ago. Basically everyone involved into the
discussion agreed that changing the binary name of qstat is the way to
go. I guess the only program that has to be patched is xqf.

kind regards,
Rudolf Kastl


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]