[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: GRUB2 In Fedora



On 11/06/2009 03:58 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 14:45 -0500, Casey Dahlin wrote:
>>
>> Because we're acting as de facto upstream for what is effectively a
>> piece of abandonware. Grub development is essentially dead. This isn't
>> a nice place to be in as a downstream.
>>
> 
> And yet grub2 still doesn't have all the things we need it to have, that
> is in our grub, and seem to still not want our stuff yet.  Also not a
> great place to be as a downstream.
> 
> 

He asked why there was a need, not whether the alternative at hand /met/ that need. I've not heard glowing recommendations of Grub 2 from people that follow it, but saying there's no reason to /want/ to be rid of Grub is silly.

--CJD


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]