Tom Lane writes:
Mike McGrath <mmcgrath redhat com> writes:Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script altogether? or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it breaks?I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package
Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken dependencies.
Description: PGP signature