[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Broken dependencies script at it again





On Nov 14, 2009, at 13:53, Sam Varshavchik <mrsam courier-mta com> wrote:

Tom Lane writes:

Mike McGrath <mmcgrath redhat com> writes:
Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script
altogether?  or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it
breaks?
I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so
that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package

Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken dependencies.


Sounds reasonable. Accepting patches if you want this done in the new future. 

--
Jes

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]