Tom Lane writes:
Mike McGrath <mmcgrath redhat com> writes:
Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script
altogether? or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it
I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so
that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire packageProposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken dependencies.
Sounds reasonable. Accepting patches if you want this done in the new future.