Broken deps for rawhide the past few days

[Jesse Keating]

On Nov 17, 2009, at 14:47, Conrad Meyer <cemeyer at u.washington.edu>  
wrote:

> On Tuesday 17 November 2009 06:50:58 am Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 11:22 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> Many of you received emails over the weekend and this morning  
>>> regarding
>>> broken deps in rawhide.  If these emails mentioned that the deps  
>>> were
>>> broken on ppc or ppc64 they can be ignored.  We are no longer  
>>> producing
>>> ppc/ppc64 as a primary arch, however we forgot to tag the config  
>>> change
>>> that enacted this on our compose tools.  We were attempting to  
>>> compose
>>> ppc(64) trees with only noarch packages, and well things didn't  
>>> work so
>>> hot.
>>>
>>> We should have this fixed today so that future emails about broken  
>>> deps
>>> will be about actual broken deps, not broken configurations.   
>>> Sorry for
>>> the mailbombing.
>>
>> *sigh*
>>
>> While we were successful in building a new mash package that would  
>> avoid
>> making ppc repos, we forgot to update one of the rawhide creation
>> configs so that it used dist-f13 content as opposed to dist-f12.   
>> So the
>> rawhide creation process has been using dist-f12 content all this  
>> time
>> to build up the chroot, which would then compose dist-f13 content.   
>> This
>> means that the dist-f12 version of mash was used, not the dist-f13
>> version we built to disable ppc.
>>
>> I've corrected that.  Third try to kill the ppc deps should be the
>> charm.
>
> Could we just not send emails tomorrow, double check that it  
> produces the
> correct result, and re-enable them for the next day? In case there's  
> something
> else we-shouldn't-have-missed-but-we-did?
>

That's one of the changes I made today.

--
Jes