[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA



Le lundi 23 novembre 2009 à 13:48 -0600, Chris Adams a écrit :
> Once upon a time, Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas mailhot laposte net> said:
> > Le lundi 23 novembre 2009 à 09:51 -0700, Jerry James a écrit :
> > > 1) I'm going to nag you forever about a problem you can't fix.
> > 
> > This is false, it can get fixed, either with code changes or by dropping
> > the offending package
> 
> Core fonts are not going away, are they? 

The infra no, the fonts (or at least part of them) yes

>  Then why the hate for legacy
> packages using a legacy interface?

The interface is legacy because it didn't work well, and we do not have
users sophisticated enough to undestand their font problems are caused
by their wandering in the legacy minefield land some packagers
recklessly expose.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]