[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA

Le Mar 24 novembre 2009 14:17, Felix Kaechele a écrit :
> Am 23.11.2009 22:50, schrieb Adam Williamson:
>> He already said that he had talked to his upstreams and they had said
>> they would not adjust their code. In that case, he really has done
>> everything he possibly can in his position as maintainer, and sending
>> him further nag emails is achieving nothing constructive and serving
>> only to annoy him.
> And eventually may lead to packagers stopping to contribute to the
> Fedora Project.
> I do not wish to be used as a medium for a fight between a stubborn Font
> Guideline Evangelist and a stubborn upstream. If it's upstream's
> decision not to adjust their code then that's the way it is. If the
> package does not cause any unexpected behavior by not following the Font
> Guidelines there is nothing further I as a package maintainer am
> required to do.

To repeat myself once again, core fonts are not free, they have a maintenance
cost, and none of the packagers that claimed using core fonts is not a problem
so far has made the logical step of taking charge of what they say is no

Either it is no problem, and you are ready to take it out of my hands, or it
is a problem, so stop pretending it is not and I'm unreasonable saying it is

Nicolas Mailhot

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]