[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA



Once upon a time, Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas mailhot laposte net> said:
> Le Mar 24 novembre 2009 17:01, Chris Adams a écrit :
> > That's not an answer.  What is the real maintenance cost?
> 
> I already explained yesterday : there are rotting Fedora Core packages to
> merge review, packaging guidelines to write to define how they are supposed to
> be cleaned up, a huge pile of existing fonts to re-check for licensing, a huge
> pile of fonts to re-check for technical soundness (ie a lot of fonts for that
> area are not encoded properly or declare bad names, should it continue to be
> hidden via manual fonts.dir or should they be converted to something cleaner,
> it we continue to go the manual fonts.dir way someone needs to review existing
> files) etc.

And how much of this is still going to be done no matter what, since
core font support is not going to be dropped?

-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams hiwaay net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]