[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Bug triage: further change upcoming



On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 22:35 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 11/24/2009 10:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi, guys. Just a quick note - Matej Cepl pointed out that the
> > already-agreed BugZappers plan to switch to using the Triaged keyword
> > only for Fedora 13 and later presents problems. Most significantly, it's
> > impossible to reliably construct a Bugzilla search which will find bugs
> > that have been triaged under *both* the F13+ and F12- methods.
> > 
> > So, we've come up with a plan. With the help of David Lawrence we
> > propose to add the Triaged keyword to all existing F10-F12 bugs that are
> > in ASSIGNED state, with the exception of anaconda bugs, PackageReview
> > bugs and FutureFeature bugs.
> 
> Why the exception for Anaconda?

at present anaconda is in a state of having opted-out from the typical
triage process, so we generally leave them out of things like this and
let them handle their own bugs. in practice this change was actually
partly designed to bring the bugzappers practice and anaconda practice
closer together, and in future this may well change, but for now we're
leaving it out just to be consistent with the current official status of
anaconda wrt bugzappers.

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]